Across – Why Are Young People Protesting Across India?
Across Young people have been taking to the streets across India, demanding governments act to provide more jobs. In the northern state of Bihar, large numbers protested in February at delays in filling public sector vacancies.
Some of them had passed the required examinations but waited several years for their job to commence. In July and early August, hundreds of young people walked more than 900km from Nagpur in central India to Delhi, again focusing on the problem of government posts lying vacant.
Behind these headlines is one of India’s most pressing problems: widespread, entrenched unemployment. Youth unemployment rose sharply from about 6% in 2011-12 to more than 17% in 2018-19. By then, nearly 40% of young graduates were unemployed.
Equally troubling has been an increase in the number of young people trapped in part-time, insecure work that doesn’t reflect their aspirations.
Diverging trendsHigh levels of unemployment and underemployment reflect two related trends: the very large numbers of young Indians drawn into education over the past 40 years, increasing demand for salaried jobs; and the Indian economy’s failure to respond with large numbers of new jobs.
Development theory suggests that agriculturally based countries will make a transition into manufacturing and services, opening up jobs for young aspirants. But this transformation isn’t occurring in India.
Read more: Digital labor platforms subject global South workers to ‘algorithmic insecurity’
The number of people working in services in India rose only marginally from about 35 million in 2005 to 39 million in 2018-19. The number of manufacturing jobs in India declined over this period. Conversely, the proportion of young people in agriculture has been increasing in recent years.
These trends have stopped India from experiencing the “demographic dividend” predicted by economists, whereby the productivity of a large youth population promotes economic growth. Not surprisingly, this dividend effect only operates if young people actually are in jobs.
Should jobs come first? Harnessing the energies of young people in India could be part of a solution to unemployment. Social research in India, including our own work in Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand, suggests young people, while frequently frustrated, often have the skills, motivation, and time to assist their communities in processes of development.
Young Indians marched for jobs last Saturday. Vishal Landge/TwitterEducated unemployed or underemployed young people have often accumulated a store of useful information and capabilities in their efforts to navigate schooling and employment markets. They also have experience in a range of places: rural, small towns,s, and big cities. Reflecting these skills and experience, they are often called on to assist their families and communities in gaining access to healthcare or educational opportunities, for example, or to attract infrastructure and development schemes.
Unemployed young people, especially young women, are often involved in challenging gender norms that have limited women’s participation in schooling and paid employment. By advising on relationships, health, and other issues, they also act as interpreters of change for the generation coming after them (teenagers and pre-teens).
Unemployed young people often have exciting ideas about how to bring about social change. Our research has shown they bring urban thinking into rural areas to encourage schooling, agriculture, and gender empowerment. In turn, they enhance the viability of rural lives. By improving schooling, unemployed young people ensure villagers remain in rural areas rather than migrate to urban areas. By campaigning for better infrastructure, they enable new business.
Harnessing the energy attempts to build on this work could usefully look at formalizing unemployed young people’s involvement in advising children about education, work, and other issues. The government might identify, support, and remunerate a group of “guides” who could help young people navigate the changing landscapes of schooling and employment.
This is especially important since teenagers’ and pre-teens’ parents, who are typically in their forties and fifties, often lack a close recent understanding of how contemporary schooling and employment markets work.
Read more: From 13 unis to 1: why Australia needs to reverse the loss of South Asian studies
The government could also partner with unemployed youth to develop new platforms for providing practical advice on rural entrepreneurship, skills, the use of technology, and other issues.
In the parts of northern India where we have worked, young people frequently emphasize the need to develop portfolio careers rather than relying on a single line of work. The state could learn from their experiences to develop new online materials and revise school and university curricula to reflect new landscapes of work.
Such schemes could assist in allowing unemployed youth to be change makers. Even if they haven’t yet been able to yield an economic dividend, many young people are producing a social and cultural dividend for India, and more should be given the chance to do so.
Job Crisis Deepens? 69% of Jobs In India Under Threat By Automation
New Delhi: Nearly 69 percent of jobs in India are under threat from automation, as the country, with its relatively young workforce, is set to add 160 million new workers over the next 20 years, a new report showed on Monday. Also, Read – These 33 Global And Indian Companies Account For Over 33K Layoffs In 2022
The main priority for the country, set to reach a working population of 1.1 billion by 2040, will be job creation to accommodate new workers entering the workforce, according to Forrester’s ‘Future Of Jobs Forecast’. Also Read – New Report Shows A Fall In Formal Job Numbers In October 2021
“India’s workforce is young, with an average age of 38, and its working population will grow by 160 million over the next 20 years,” said Michael O’Grady, principal forecast analyst at Forrester. Also Read – Infosys Using Automation to Transform Clients’ Business: Nilekani
In addition, India’s labor force participation rate, which measures the share of the working-age population currently working, has dropped to just 41 percent, he added.
- The working populations in the five largest economies in the Asia Pacific — India, China, South Korea, Australia, and Japan — are more at risk due to physical robot automation than in Europe and North America.
- By 2040, 63 million jobs are expected to be lost to automation, with more than 247 million jobs expected to be in jeopardy across industries that are more susceptible to automation, such as construction and agriculture, the report noted.
- India, China, South Korea, Australia, and Japan will create 28.5 million new jobs in renewable energy, green buildings, smart cities and smart infrastructure, and professional services by 2040.
- But even with the creation of new jobs in areas such as the green economy and information and communications technology (ICT) industries, 13.7 million jobs in the region will be lost to automation across wholesale, retail, transport, accommodation, and leisure sectors.
- By 2040, China will see its working population decline by 11 percent, and 7 percent of jobs will be lost to automation.
- Due to an aging workforce and the country’s low birth rate, between 2020 and 2040, Japan’s working population will contract by 19 percent. By 2050, it is forecasted to decline by almost one-third.
Michael O’Grady, principal forecast analyst at Forrester mentioned that “To prepare for the changes brought on by automation, the five largest economies in APAC will have to radically rethink their workforce strategies.”
He also added that “While each economy faces its own challenges, common focus areas such as hiring more female workers can help offset working population declines. In addition, investing in STEM education, technology workforce training, and protecting the rights of freelance workers will become of utmost importance.”
(With inputs from IANS)
Not Just Taiwan: India Could Be China’s Next Target >>Across<<
China’s fulminations against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan are being choreographed as military activism that won’t culminate in any full-blown conflict with the U.S.-led Western powers.
But it is not just Taiwan that needs to worry. India should be increasingly wary of China under these circumstances. Beijing is likely to manifest its retaliation by further cudgeling the neighbor that it considers a soft target rather than provoke a clash with the West by invading Taiwan.
During special military-level bilateral talks on August 6, just days after Pelosi’s Taiwan visit, Indian delegates raised objections over Chinese violations of Indian airspace and confidence-building measures near the disputed 3,488-kilometer Line of Actual Control (LAC), the Himalayan frontier that divides the two nuclear-armed Asian powers.
Even as over 50,000 People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops continue to occupy swathes of the eastern sector of India’s Union Territory of Ladakh at the north-western LAC after their violent clash with Indian soldiers in the Pangong Tso (lake) area in May 2020, China is opening up additional fronts along India’s border states of Uttarakhand, Arunachal Pradesh, and Sikkim.
Beijing has been emboldened by the fact that days after the PLA slew twenty Indian soldiers in eastern Ladakh on June 15, 2020—the first deadly skirmish since the 1962 Sino-Indian war—Prime Minister Narendra Modi said, “No intruder is present inside India’s borders, nor is any post under anyone’s custody.” Modi has not only avoided identifying China as the aggressor but also refrained from bringing up the issue with Chinese President Xi Jinping, which many Indians believe would help defuse the tensions.
Beijing chose the summer of 2020 as the time for its attack because Covid-torn India betrayed deep economic and political vulnerability. It may have discerned military vulnerability as well.
As the stand-off simmers, with troops on either side ranged against each other in this desolate but strategically important desert of the Great Himalayas, a menacing China is steering the situation towards a flashpoint.
China has now planned to forcibly relocate more than 100,000 Tibetans from the northern Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR) to Shannan, or Lhoka, Prefecture in southeastern TAR over the next eight years, contending that the move is to get the people away from “harsh weather and relatively backward production and living conditions”. However, the real consequences would be the end of the traditional Tibetan way of life, with those being relocated unaware of what will happen to them as they are forced into a completely alien way of life.
Lhoka lies close to the border with Arunachal Pradesh, India’s northeastern state that abuts the eastern fringe of the LAC across from the TAR and which China claims as an “inherent part” of its territory and calls “Zangnan,” or “South Tibet.” China has extended a large part of its south to India’s frontiers ever since it annexed Tibet in 1950, and it has pledged to retake Arunachal—by force, if necessary—just as it has vowed to retake Taiwan.
India has rejected China’s contention by asserting that Arunachal has “always been, and will always be, an integral part of India.” Similarly, Taiwan has affirmed that it is a sovereign nation with no need to declare independence; its first woman president, Tsai Ing-wen, maintains that her country will do “whatever it takes” to defend itself.
During an unannounced three-day visit a year ago to Xizang (the Chinese name for Tibet), Xi traveled to Nyingchi, close to the Arunachal border—the first such official visit by a Chinese leader in thirty years. Nyingchi has now linked to Lhasa over 435 kilometers away due to the launch of a high-speed train service, which, according to Communist Party of China mouthpiece Global Times, has been converted into a military transport mission for carrying troops and arms.
According to news reports, Indian intelligence has determined that the PLA has been recruiting young Tibetans and training them with heavy machine guns, mortar bombs, and rocket launchers. Every Tibetan family is mandated to send at least one young member for recruitment, according to Indian news reports. Chinese official media also reported that during his landmark visit to Nyingchi, Xi, who heads China’s Central Military Commission (CMC), the supreme military policy-making body, lauded the border guard battalions in Tibet for doing a “great job” in the last five years.
Former Indian Army Chief Gen. M.M. Naravane has expressed concern at “the largescale build-up” in eastern Ladakh that “continues to be in place.” “So it means that they [PLA] are there to stay,” he had remarked. “We are keeping a close watch on all these developments, but if they are there to stay, we are here to stay too.” A typically hawkish editorial in Global Times exclaimed: “If India starts a war, it will definitely lose.”
Even as the PLA continues to occupy Patrolling Point 15 (PP15) in Hot Springs and PP17A near Gogra post, China has amassed additional troops across the border, armed with artillery, air defenses, combat drones, and heavy vehicles. Apart from creating and extending road and rail connectivity in the border regions, China has also been constructing military airfields for operating both fixed-wing and rotor aircraft.
A Pentagon report confirms the construction of a 100-home enclave and another of 60 houses by China well within Arunachal. As part of its deception warfare at the LAC, China has been constructing “dual-use” border villages and installations, where civilian settlements are being upgraded to military enclaves and civilian airfields are being converted into PLA Air Force bases.
India fears that China’s intrusions are an indicator of what it views as “salami slicing,” whereby Beijing seeks to scythe through India, and neighboring Bhutanese, a territory with the intent of redrawing the LAC. Ruling Bharatiya Janata Party Member of Parliament Tapir Gao said, “I want to tell media houses in the country that there is no coverage of the extent to which China has captured Indian territory [in Arunachal Pradesh].”
Despite three previous border agreements, Beijing disputes most demarcations with India. In 2017, it had a seventy-three-day standoff with India at the India-China-Bhutan tri-junction of Doklam—the most critical in decades.
In another act of aggression last year, over 100 PLA soldiers and fifty-five horses intruded over five kilometers into Indian territory and demolished infrastructure, including a bridge, at Barahoti in the Himalayan state of Uttarakhand, which has not been a major border flashpoint in years. They returned to base before they could be confronted.
China has also been systematically encroaching into picturesque Bhutan, with satellite images showing fully-developed Chinese villages well within the world’s only Buddhist kingdom. One such settlement, nine kilometers from the Doklam tri-junction, could provide China access to Bhutan’s key Jhampari Ridge, from where PLA troops could outflank Indian defenses in adjoining Sikkim.
Jhampari Ridge would also bring the Siliguri Corridor in the Indian state of West Bengal within PLA artillery range. India considers the sixty-kilometer long and twenty-two-kilometer wide corridor highly strategic because it borders Bhutan, Nepal, and Bangladesh and connects its eight northeastern states, including Arunachal, with the rest of the country.
Some 200 PLA soldiers also reportedly crossed the LAC in Arunachal’s Tawang area last year to target Indian defenses but turned back without any scuffle. Tawang is particularly contentious for the Chinese, for it was in this town that the
14th Dalai Lama found initial refuge in India after having dodged the Chinese Army on his flight from Tibet’s provincial capital Lhasa in 1959. China has always resented India’s decision to provide sanctuary to the Dalai Lama, whom it does not recognize as the spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism.
India nonetheless realizes that while the United States regards it as a vital strategic partner, Washington has not been proactive either politically or militarily in addressing Beijing’s military posturing on its land borders with India. India alone must manage to stand its ground against Chinese aggression.
While Washington is mandated to defend Taiwan, it is clearly not inclined to provide “boots on the ground” support for India, nor does it seek to establish any military bases in or around the country as a counterpoint to Chinese hegemony.
It is this situation that emboldens the People’s Republic of China in its transgressions against India. >>Across<<
Sarosh Bana is Executive Editor of Business India in Mumbai, the Regional Editor for the Indo-Pacific of Germany’s Naval Forces journal, and India Correspondent of Sydney-based cyber security journal, Asia Pacific Security Magazine (APSM). Sarosh studied in India, Switzerland, and Germany, and has been a member of the Board of the East-West Centre (EWC) Association, a Hawaii-based think tank.
>>Across<< >>Across<< >>Across<< >>Across<< >>Across<< >>Across<< >>Across<< >>Across<< >>Across<< >>Across<< >>Across<<
Vintage Skill: is a professional education platform. Here we will provide you only interesting content that you will love very much. We depend on the information about jobs and are Dedicated to providing you with the best education with focus. We are working to transform our passion for education into a fast-growing online website. We hope you enjoy our education as much as we enjoy giving them to you. I will keep posting more important posts on my website for all of you. Please give your support and love.