Non-Joining Duty Vacancies Should Be Treated As Fresh Vacancies: Kerala high court recruitment
The Kerala High Court on Tuesday held that the Non-Joining Duty (NJD) vacancies that arose in the post of Preventive Officer at the Public Service Commission (PSC) after the amendment of Part III of Kerala State & Subordinate Service Rules (Special Rules) will have to be filled as per the amended Rules and not the erstwhile Rules.
A Division Bench of Justice A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar and Justice Mohammed Nias C.P also reiterated that a vacancy that arises due to an advised candidate not reporting for duty pursuant to the advice has to be treated as a fresh vacancy.
In 2017, the PSC invited applications for the post of Preventive Officer after which a rank list was published. In the meanwhile, the Special Rules were amended taking away the source of direct recruitment to the post of Preventive Officer.
However, despite the amendment, PSC proceeded with the selection process already initiated and issued an advice memo and appointment orders to 158 candidates from the rank list. Since only 116 candidates joined the service, another 42 NJD vacancies were reported in 2011.
However, only four vacancies were filled from the existing rank list since the list expired on 11.5.2011. Consequently, a fresh notification was issued by the PSC followed by a rank list.
The fresh notification and the consequent selection process were challenged before the Kerala Administrative Tribunal by in-service candidates contending that the NJD vacancies had to be filled in terms of the amended Special Rules which had taken away the source of direct recruitment as a method of filling up the vacancies in the post of Preventive Officer.
The Tribunal found that the vacancies initially notified could be seen as extinguished only on a person being advised against the same, joined duty, and discharged the duties attached to the post. Therefore, it was held that the substantial vacancy, which was relatable to a period prior to the introduction of the Special Rules, was not extinguished and continued to remain in existence till a candidate was appointed to the vacancy and commenced service.
Since the NJD vacancies were traceable to a period prior to the amendment of the Special Rules, there was no illegality in the PSC issuing the fresh notification and continuing with the selection process.
Aggrieved by this decision, the petitioner approached the High Court.
Senior Advocate Jaju Babu assisted by Advocate Brijesh Mohan appearing for the petitioner argued that when there is a change in the Rules governing recruitment, the vacancies that arise subsequent to the amendment have to be filled in accordance with the amended Rules and not in accordance with the erstwhile Rules. It was also argued that for NJD vacancies, the mere fact that they could be traced to a period prior to the amendment of the Special Rules could not be a reason to hold that the vacancies had to be filled in accordance with the erstwhile Rules.
However, Advocate Elvin Peter appearing for the respondents submitted that the NJD vacancies had to be seen as vacancies that arose on dates prior to the amendment of the Special Rules, and hence, they could have been filled only in accordance with the erstwhile Rules and not in accordance with the Special Rules.
The Court noted that it was settled that a vacancy that arises consequent to an advised candidate not reporting for duty pursuant to the advice, has to be treated as a fresh vacancy.
On the facts of the case, it was found that the NJD vacancies had to be seen as fresh vacancies arising on the date on which they were notified, and in that event, it was the amended Special Rules that had to govern the filing up of the said vacancies.
In fact, the Division Bench concluded that there was no justification whatsoever for the employer to have reported the NJD vacancies to the PSC at all since the amended Special Rules had taken away the source of direct recruitment as a method of recruitment to the post in question.
“We, therefore, cannot accept the finding of the Tribunal in the impugned order that notwithstanding the non-joining of the advised candidates, the vacancies subsisted as those that had arisen on a date prior to the amendment of the Special Rules.”
The Court also held reiterated that the law that vacancies should be filled in accordance with the Rules existing at the time of arising of the vacancy is not one of universal application and would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case and the decision taken by the employer in such cases.
As such, the impugned order of the Tribunal was set aside.
Case Title: Santhosh Kumar v. State of Kerala & Ors.
Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Ker) 438
Click Here To Read/Download The Order
Kerala High Court Upholds Recruitment Eligibility Conditions In NTPC
A Division Bench of the Kerala High Court on Monday upheld the condition in the recruitment notification by the National Thermal Power Corporation Limited (NTPC) that candidates applying for the posts of Assistant Law Officer should have cleared the Common Law Admission Test for Postgraduate (CLAT PG).
The Bench comprising Justice A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar and Justice Mohammed Nias C.P. Passed the verdict while allowing an appeal filed by NTPC against a single judge’s order holding that the prescription of such a qualification violated the right of the citizen to equal opportunity in public employment guaranteed under Article 16 of the Constitution.
The Bench observed that the finding of the single judge could not be upheld. Article 16 only spoke of the equality of opportunity and not the opportunity to achieve equality. All that was required was a public advertisement that enables all “eligible” persons to compete for selection on merit.
Setting aside the single judge’s order, the Bench also observed that the basic principle underlying Article 14 of the Constitution was only to ensure that law must operate equally on all persons under the like circumstances and a discretionary power conferred on the employer to fix the eligibility standards or qualification could not be held to be discriminatory.
The court observed that the selection process did not suffer from the vice of discrimination or arbitrariness.
Top Kerala News Developments Today
Updated: August 24, 2022 09:51 IST
Kerala Bureau August 24, 2022, 09:51 IST
Updated: August 24, 2022 09:51 IST
Key news developments in Kerala on Aug 24, Wednesday
File photo for representation. ||
Key news developments in Kerala on Aug 24, Wednesday
Here are the important developments from Kerala to watch out for today
- Kerala Assembly today: Discussion on the University Laws (Amendment) Bill, Kerala Local Self Government Common Service Bill, Kerala Industrial Single Window Clearance Boards, and Industrial Township Area Development (Amendment) Bill, Kerala Public Enterprises (Selection and Recruitment) Board Bill, Kerala Fiscal Responsibility (Amendment) Bill and Kerala Livestock and Poultry Feed and Mineral Mixture (Regulation of Manufacture and Sale) Bill.
- Union Minister of State for Commerce and Industry Anupriya Patel to open the golden jubilee of the Marine Products Export Development Authority in Kochi.
- Petitions seeking timely disbursement of salary to KSRTC employees are likely to come up before the Kerala High Court today.
- High Court is likely to take up for hearing an appeal filed by the State Government for canceling the bail granted to social activist Civic Chandran.
- Portrait of Olympian Chandrasekharan to be unveiled at Maharaja’s College, Ernakulam today to mark the footballer’s first death anniversary.
Read more news from Kerala here.
Note : एक प्रोफेशनल एजुकेशन प्लेटफॉर्म है। यहां हम आपको केवल दिलचस्प सामग्री प्रदान करेंगे जो आपको बहुत पसंद आएगी। हम निर्भरता और नौकरियों की जानकारी पर
ध्यान देने के साथ आपको सर्वोत्तम शिक्षा प्रदान करने के लिए समर्पित हैं। हम शिक्षा के लिए अपने जुनून को एक तेजी से बढ़ती ऑनलाइन वेबसाइट में बदलने के लिए काम कर रहे हैं।
हम आशा करते हैं कि आप हमारी शिक्षा का उतना ही आनंद लेंगे जितना हम उन्हें आपको देने में आनंद लेते हैं। मैं आप सभी के लिए अपनी वेबसाइट पर और भी महत्वपूर्ण पोस्ट डालता रहूंगा। कृपया अपना समर्थन और प्यार दें।
Kerala high court recruitment ||Kerala high court recruitment Kerala high court recruitment || Kerala high court recruitment ||Kerala high court recruitment Kerala high court recruitment ||Kerala high court recruitment ||Kerala high court recruitment Kerala high court recruitment ||Kerala high court recruitment ||Kerala high court recruitment Kerala high court recruitment ||Kerala high court recruitment ||Kerala high court recruitment Kerala high court recruitment ||Kerala high court recruitment ||Kerala high court recruitment Kerala high court recruitment ||